- Sighthound vs securityspy how to#
- Sighthound vs securityspy 1080p#
- Sighthound vs securityspy manual#
What really lets the Link-U cams down is crappy software, but SecuritySpy more than covers those shortcomings. The hardware is solid with some great features. Long story short - Link-U feels very much like a beta product and is still under development. DDNS is on-board too, as is UPnP and two-way audio, so the Link-U cams tick a lot of boxes.
Sighthound vs securityspy how to#
Multicast is also supported, but I'm not sure how to use it. There's support in there for FTP, SMTP, TCP and HTTP for motion, audio and infra-red, but I can thus far only get continuous recording to the SD working. Unfortunately the cam's on-board software still needs some work as I can't get the Events functioning correctly. The option to have coloured night vision allows for recording bright areas leading into the room while the night vision covers the dark room itself. Night vision works well and I have one of the cams setup in a dark room downstairs at all times. I'd have preferred maybe 90-100 degrees for better facial recognition, but 130 degrees seems to be the standard, so I can live with that.
![sighthound vs securityspy sighthound vs securityspy](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/51/a2/85/51a28571e244278d01bb4cf8558490a3.jpg)
The overall image quality is good, but field-of-view is 130 degrees, so there's some fish-eye warping going on. I don't have anything to compare it with, but I'll be getting some internal & external Hikvisions soon and can offer a more informed opinion at that time.
Sighthound vs securityspy 1080p#
The streams are highly configurable (up to 1080p 30FPS) with tonnes of options. Once I logged into the web interface, the Link-U cams really opened up. The only reason I stumbled upon it is the cams popped up in SecuritySpy and I clicked the "Open in web browser" button.
![sighthound vs securityspy sighthound vs securityspy](http://getdrawings.com/img/greyhound-head-silhouette-26.jpg)
Furthermore, there was no information about the cam's web browser interface, let alone how to access it. The Link-U iOS app is bad at best and crashes at the drop of a hat (they are working on it).
![sighthound vs securityspy sighthound vs securityspy](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/91/b6/db/91b6db78117fd53744a19d3552f36ed8.jpg)
Until recently, the investment in the two Link-U cams was a complete dud. In a nutshell, I wanted internal cams that worked if the bad guys cut the internet and/or power, or if ethernet & wi-fi fell over for any reason.
![sighthound vs securityspy sighthound vs securityspy](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/3c/b2/f4/3cb2f41c98bed1bfbc5abdd0985a7828.jpg)
The primary reason for doing so is the Link-U cams support 4G and battery-backup, alongside on-board SD recording. I backed the Link-U cams on Indiegogo a few years back now. Other apps connect just fine by simply using rtsp://192.168.1.200:554/v01 in the address field.Īny suggestions to get the rtsp URL working in SecuritySpy? The camera supports v01-v06 for the streams.Īll the URL components are in place, yet SecuritySpy still can't connect.
Sighthound vs securityspy manual#
Profile is Manual configuration to allow for a Request string (Input or stream number doesn't work).įormat is RTSP TCP (I've tried the other options too). HTTP port, RTSP port, Username, Password are all correctly set (I've tried leaving these blank). The Address field seems to be pre-formatted to and the app doesn't have a Protocol menu for rtsp:// etc, so I'm not sure how to get the URL correctly formatted. How do I transfer this URL format across to SecuritySpy? They're not on the compatibility list, nor are they seemingly ONVIF (appear in Auto-Discovery but require a Request string), however they can be accessed in other software such as BlueIris on PC and Sighthound on Mac using the rtsp address - rtsp://192.168.1.200:554/v01 I'm attempting to connect two Link-U cameras to SecuritySpy, so far with no success.